The 4% rule has long served as a guideline for sustainable retirement withdrawals, but recent actuarial and financial studies suggest it may no longer be reliably “safe” in the post-2020 environment. Most updated analyses recommend lower withdrawal rates – typically between 2.8% and 3.3% – due to lower expected returns and heightened inflation risk.
Impact of Post-2020 Inflation and Market Conditions
Firstly, studies highlight that the original 4% rule was based on historical periods with higher asset returns and lower inflation volatility than what is expected going forward. Recent analyses using advanced statistical models and consensus forecasts now suggest a safe withdrawal rate closer to 2.8% – 3.3% for new retirees, reflecting lower projected returns and greater inflation uncertainty (Khang, Pakula and Clarke, 2022; EarlyRetirementNow, 2017; O’flinn and Schirripa, 2010).
Additionally, historical reviews show that the 4% rule has a higher risk of failure for longer retirements or during periods of sustained high inflation, with failure rates rising significantly for 30+ year horizons or clustered inflation shocks (O’flinn and Schirripa, 2010; EarlyRetirementNow, 2017; Khang, Pakula and Clarke, 2022).
Discover more about Retirement Planning in our guides!
Revised Actuarial Approaches
Actuarial and simulation-based studies now recommend more flexible withdrawal strategies. These include adjusting withdrawals based on remaining portfolio value or using age-based withdrawal percentages, rather than sticking to a fixed inflation-adjusted amount (Leggio, Lien and Dai, 2024; Rob, 2023; Khang, Pakula and Clarke, 2022).
Furthermore, some research finds that while a 4.5% withdrawal rate may be technically “”safe”” for certain high-risk-tolerance groups, it often results in insufficient income for most retirees, especially when accounting for real-world spending needs and inflation (Daraei and Sendova, 2024).
Finally, the inefficiency of the 4% rule is also noted, as it often leads to unspent surpluses or overpayments, suggesting that retirees may benefit from more personalized, dynamic withdrawal plans (Scott, Sharpe and Watson, 2008; Rob, 2023; Leggio, Lien and Dai, 2024).
International and Early Retirement Considerations
The 4% rule is even less reliable in non-U.S. or emerging market contexts, where asset returns and inflation patterns differ, and safe withdrawal rates are often lower (Meng and Pfau, 2011).
Also, early retirees with longer time horizons are particularly advised to use lower initial withdrawal rates due to increased longevity and market risk (EarlyRetirementNow, 2017; O’flinn and Schirripa, 2010; Khang, Pakula and Clarke, 2022).
Find out more about investing in our Investing Strategies & Portfolio Management guides, here!
Conclusion
In summary, actuarial studies and financial research post-2020 indicate that the traditional 4% rule is likely too optimistic for most retirees, especially in the face of lower expected returns and higher inflation. A more conservative withdrawal rate – around 3% – and flexible, adaptive strategies are now recommended for greater retirement security.
References
- Rob, B., 2023. Time to Retire: The 4% Withdrawal Rule. **, 32, pp. 91 – 111. https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2023.1.264
- O’flinn, C., & Schirripa, F., 2010. Revisiting Retirement Withdrawal Plans and Their Historical Rates of Return. SIRN: Retirement Income (Topic). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1641382
- Leggio, K., Lien, D., & Dai, Y., 2024. The Death of the 4% Rule: New Market Conditions and Retiree Needs Require Rethinking Retirement Spending. **, 11, pp. 40 – 60. https://doi.org/10.3905/jor.2024.1.154
