At the core of Financial Infidelity is trust. Trust is the cornerstone of any successful relationship – but when it comes to money, that trust is often tested. One of the most insidious threats to marital stability is financial secrecy, commonly expressed through hidden spending, secret accounts, or undisclosed debts. While it may seem minor compared to infidelity or abuse, research consistently shows that financial dishonesty significantly increases the risk of divorce. In fact, it can serve as both a symptom and a cause of deeper relational issues. This blog post dives into the psychology and data behind financial secrecy, drawing on leading research to unpack how hidden spending affects relationships and what can be done to prevent it.
Financial Conflict: A Leading Indicator of Divorce
Among the various challenges couples face, financial disagreements stand out as a particularly toxic force. A landmark study by Dew et al. (2012) found that financial disagreements are stronger predictors of divorce than arguments over chores, sex, or in-laws. This is particularly concerning because financial disputes often occur early in the relationship and can become chronic if not addressed. Unlike other disagreements that may be situational or fade over time, money issues can be persistent and deeply embedded in personal values, upbringing, and stress responses.
What makes financial conflict so potent? According to the research, it’s not just about money itself – it’s about what money represents: security, control, trust, and even love. Hidden spending undermines these representations, planting seeds of mistrust that often flourish into resentment and emotional disconnection.
The Silent Erosion of Trust: Hidden Spending in Focus
Financial infidelity – defined as secretly spending money, hiding debts, or lying about finances – creates a ripple effect of distrust that can destabilize even the most solid partnerships. In a longitudinal study of marital problems from 1980 to 1992, Amato et al. (1997) found that “spending money foolishly” was among the top predictors of divorce, alongside issues like infidelity and substance abuse. Significantly, this issue was more frequently reported by wives, indicating gendered differences in financial transparency and expectations.
The act of hiding purchases or financial information isn’t just deceitful – it is psychologically corrosive. It often leads the non-offending partner to question what else might be hidden, whether their partner respects them, or whether their goals are truly aligned. Over time, these doubts wear down emotional intimacy and cooperation.
Gendered Consequences and Economic Fallout
While financial dishonesty may trigger relational breakdown, the consequences of divorce are often unevenly distributed. Leopold (2018) analyzed gender differences in post-divorce outcomes and found that women tend to face chronic economic strain, particularly through loss of household income, increased risk of poverty, and single parenting burdens. Men, on the other hand, often experience a more temporary decrease in well-being.
This disparity means that financial secrecy can have not only emotional but also long-term socioeconomic repercussions, especially for women. In relationships where one partner controls most financial information, hidden spending can represent a broader issue of power imbalance. The fallout of such dynamics extends beyond the relationship itself, influencing housing stability, parenting roles, and even mental health.
Why Couples Struggle With Financial Transparency
The reluctance to disclose financial infidelity often stems from shame, fear of judgment, or incompatible financial values. Research by Kruger et al. (2023) shows that couples are more likely to pool finances – and by extension, be financially transparent – when they agree on spending habits, have positive net worth, and larger household sizes. These conditions create a sense of shared purpose and mutual accountability. Conversely, in relationships with financial inequality or mismatched money attitudes, partners may feel compelled to hide purchases or withhold financial information.
Additionally, unresolved trauma, poor communication skills, and external stressors like job loss or health issues can all contribute to the likelihood of financial secrecy. In this way, hidden spending is often a symptom of deeper dysfunctions rather than a standalone issue.
Why not check out our retirement planning guides, here?
Can Therapy Help? Intervention Strategies That Work
Fortunately, evidence-based couples therapy and psychoeducation programs offer real hope. Programs like the FRAME intervention (Wadsworth et al., 2011), which focuses on financial stress management and communication skills, have shown positive outcomes in reducing financial secrecy and improving relational satisfaction among low-income couples. Similarly, Britt-Lutter et al. (2018) demonstrated that structured “love and money” conversations helped couples increase their happiness and reduce stress through improved financial transparency.
Key components of successful interventions include:
- Joint participation: Couples benefit more when they attend sessions together.
- Communication training: Learning how to talk about money without blame or fear is crucial.
- Coping skill development: Emotional regulation helps reduce impulsive or avoidant financial behaviors.
- Goal alignment: Setting shared financial goals fosters collaboration and accountability.
These interventions are particularly effective when tailored to the couple’s socioeconomic context, relationship stage, and individual psychological profiles.
Stress, Hormones, and Risky Decisions
Interestingly, the biological side of financial secrecy has also come under scrutiny. Cueva et al. (2015) found that cortisol and testosterone can increase financial risk-taking, particularly under stress. While this research primarily focuses on market behavior, it has implications for couples: under chronic stress, individuals may be more impulsive, secretive, or irrational in financial decision-making. These behaviors, when unnoticed or unaddressed, can destabilize relationships from the inside out.
Therapies that include stress-reduction techniques – such as mindfulness, CBT, or even physical touch interventions (Holt‐Lunstad et al., 2008) – may enhance relational stability by improving physiological and emotional self-regulation.
Moving Forward: Prevention and Repair
To guard against the corrosive effects of financial secrecy, couples can take proactive steps:
- Normalize financial check-ins: Regular, judgment-free discussions about money build trust and reduce financial infidelity and secrecy.
- Set shared financial goals: Whether it’s saving for a vacation or buying a home, aligned goals reinforce partnership.
- Create a joint budget: Transparency about income, debt, and spending habits helps prevent misunderstandings.
- Seek help early: Don’t wait for a crisis. Engaging with a couples’ therapist or financial counselor can prevent escalation.
- Use tech tools wisely: Shared budgeting apps can foster transparency but should be used cooperatively, not punitively.
Conclusion
Hidden spending is more than a financial faux pas – it’s a relational red flag. Research consistently shows that financial secrecy correlates with lower marital satisfaction and higher divorce rates. However, awareness and targeted interventions can mitigate these risks. By prioritizing transparency, emotional regulation, and open communication, couples can not only protect their financial health but also nurture deeper, more resilient relationships.
If you found this useful; feel free to check out our other guides!
References
- Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1997). A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(3), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.2307/353949
- Britt-Lutter, S., et al. (2018). Love and money: Reducing stress and improving couple happiness. Marriage & Family Review, 54(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2018.1427757
- Cueva, C., et al. (2015). Cortisol and testosterone increase financial risk taking and may destabilize markets. Scientific Reports, 5, 11206. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11206
- Dew, J., Britt, S. L., & Huston, S. (2012). Examining the relationship between financial issues and divorce. Family Relations, 61(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00715.x
- Holt‐Lunstad, J., Birmingham, W., & Light, K. C. (2008). Influence of a “warm touch” support enhancement intervention among married couples on ambulatory blood pressure, oxytocin, alpha amylase, and cortisol. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70(9), 976–985. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e318187aef7
- Kruger, M., et al. (2023). Factors associated with couples pooling their finances. Contemporary Family Therapy, 45, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-023-09665-7
- Leopold, T. (2018). Gender differences in the consequences of divorce: A study of multiple outcomes. Demography, 55(3), 769–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0667-6
- Wadsworth, M. E., et al. (2011). Preliminary efficacy of an intervention to reduce psychosocial stress and improve coping in low-income families. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3-4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9384-z
